Who Should Be the Next James Bond?

For over six decades, James Bond has been more than a fictional spy. He’s been a reflection of the era, shaped as much by geopolitical anxieties as by evolving tastes in masculinity, style, and heroism. Sean Connery’s smooth, sardonic portrayal was very much a man of the 1960s, Roger Moore’s lighter touch suited the camp of the ’70s and ’80s, Pierce Brosnan’s polish fit the sleek action films of the ’90s, and Daniel Craig’s brooding, physically intense Bond matched the grittier tone of the post-9/11 world. Whoever takes over next must balance the character’s timeless charm with qualities that speak to today’s audiences.

One name that has consistently surfaced is Idris Elba. For years, the British actor has been championed by fans for his charisma, range, and ability to project both toughness and elegance. He has the gravitas to make Bond believable in moments of quiet calculation and the physical presence to deliver the action. Elba himself has played coy about the prospect, alternately embracing and downplaying the speculation. While some argue he may now be too old for a long run in the role, others believe he could bring a reinvention that would breathe new life into the franchise.

Another leading contender is Henry Cavill. The Man of Steel star, who famously came close to landing the role when Craig was cast, seems to embody the classic Bond look. Cavill has the stature, the accent, and a resume filled with action roles, from Mission: Impossible – Fallout to The Man from U.N.C.L.E.. His critics question whether his image is too polished, perhaps lacking the raw edge that defined Craig’s tenure, but his screen presence is undeniable.

Regé-Jean Page, whose breakout in Bridgerton made him an international heartthrob, has also emerged as a favorite. Page brings a sense of modern sophistication and could appeal to a younger demographic while still fitting the classic Bond mold. His charm is effortless, and his career is on the rise, making him a strategically smart choice for producers seeking a long-term 007.

For those advocating a bold departure, names like James Norton, known for his work in McMafia and Happy Valley, offer a more grounded, understated interpretation. Norton’s brooding intelligence and ability to navigate moral complexity could align with a version of Bond that leans into espionage realism rather than blockbuster spectacle.

Then there’s the possibility of an unexpected choice—someone not yet on the public’s radar as a Bond candidate. Producers Barbara Broccoli and Michael G. Wilson have historically surprised audiences with their picks. Daniel Craig was not an obvious choice when first announced, and his casting initially faced skepticism before winning over critics and fans alike. A relative unknown could allow audiences to see the character without the baggage of previous iconic roles.

The conversation also touches on whether Bond should evolve in ways that break from tradition. While producers have stated the character will remain male, discussions around diversity, representation, and how Bond’s relationships with women are portrayed continue to shape casting considerations. Whoever takes the role must navigate the cultural expectations of a modern audience without losing the essential traits that make 007 who he is—sophistication, resourcefulness, danger, and allure.